Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than the LG G Pro 2, with a 75.8 score against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy A6's design is a lot newer, just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the LG G Pro 2. LG G Pro 2 has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy A6, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The LG G Pro 2 has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a better resolution of 1920 x 1080px, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A6 has a camera that's just as good as LG G Pro 2's camera, and although the Galaxy A6 has a more MP camera, a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a lot larger aperture, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A6 counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A6 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB. LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A6 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.