Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is slightly better than the LG G Pro 2's score of 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy A70 construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner than the LG G Pro 2's, but it is just a little heavier. These devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has newer 10 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
LG G Pro 2 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a bit lower display density, a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little smaller screen. LG G Pro 2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less cpu cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy A70 has a very superior battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41 percent more battery size. LG G Pro 2 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller sensor and a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it costs more than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G Pro 2. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the LG G Pro 2, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.