Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the LG G Pro 2, having an 87.5 score against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy A71's construction is way newer and a little bit thinner, but a little heavier than LG G Pro 2. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 has a more recent 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a CPU that's very similar to LG G Pro 2's processor, because although the Galaxy A71 has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and 4 more processing cores. LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit inferior number of pixels per display inch and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Galaxy A71 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A71 captures much clearer photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A71 also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures and a much larger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy A71 features a much longer battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 costs a lot more money than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.