Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than LG G Pro 2, getting a score of 92.9 against 74.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it provides you some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a just a little bit heavier phone than LG G Pro 2, but both are equally thin.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a little smaller screen, a just a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a much bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos, a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.