Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than the LG G Pro 2, having an 85.2 score against 74.8. The Galaxy A9 (2018) body is extremely newer and a little thinner, but also just a little heavier than LG G Pro 2. Galaxy A9 (2018)'s CPU is very similar to the processor in LG G Pro 2, because although the Galaxy A9 (2018) has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores (but slower).
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), although it has a quite smaller display, a bit lower pixels count in each inch in the display and a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) features a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A9 (2018) also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a larger sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Galaxy A9 (2018) features greater battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 3800mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.