Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is way better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. The Galaxy Fold construction is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also a lot heavier than the LG G Pro 2. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Pro 2 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Fold features a little bit better performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores.
Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lesser mega pixels back camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Pro 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG G Pro 2, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.