Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 general score. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy M20 has 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives you lots of additional features and performance enhancements. The Galaxy M20 design is way newer, but a bit thicker and a bit heavier than LG G Pro 2.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit lower number of pixels per screen inch and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. LG G Pro 2 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has lesser RAM memory and less CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy M20 features a much better battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
The LG G Pro 2 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in low light environments, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the LG G Pro 2 also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.