Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M21 has a global score of 84.1, which is better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 overall score. Galaxy M21's design is noticeably newer, but a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than LG G Pro 2. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy M21 has newer 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
The LG G Pro 2 features a bit better screen than Galaxy M21, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy M21's processing unit is just as good as the LG G Pro 2 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M21 has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy M21 captures greater pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M21 also has a much larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a larger camera aperture and a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels.
Galaxy M21 counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy M21 has a way better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has an 88 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.