Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is better than the LG G Pro 2, having a general score of 87.7 against 74.8. The Galaxy M51 is a extremely newer phone than LG G Pro 2, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M51 has the newer 10 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
Galaxy M51 has a processing unit that's very similar to the LG G Pro 2 one, because although the Galaxy M51 has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (although they are slower). The LG G Pro 2 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy M51, although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a little less pixels per inch of display and a little bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a superior battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 119% more battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes way better pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a much bigger aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments, a way larger sensor and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.