Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than LG G Pro 2, having a 90.8 score against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a heavier cellphone than LG G Pro 2, but they have the same thickness. LG G Pro 2 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little bit smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a little better processing power than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a superior camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger diafragm aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much greater memory for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features superior battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Pro 2. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG G Pro 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.