Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 98.9 against 74.8. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it counts with some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than LG G Pro 2.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit superior CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little smaller display, a little less pixels per inch of screen and a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much longer battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has a much better video resolution, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.