Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the LG G Pro 2, having an 89 score against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design is much newer, a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the LG G Pro 2. Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, although it has a little less pixels per display inch, a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller screen. Galaxy Note10 takes slightly better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a way bigger camera aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit better battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G Pro 2. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG G Pro 2, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.