Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is way better than the LG G Pro 2's global score of 74.8. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, providing you some nice extra features. The Galaxy S10 5G body is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but also heavier than LG G Pro 2.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little faster CPU than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and 5 GB more RAM. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a quite smaller display, much lesser pixels per display inch and a way lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
Galaxy S10 5G takes clearer photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations and a larger camera sensor. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.