Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has an overall score of 89.7, which is way better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a way newer and a bit thinner phone than LG G Pro 2, although it's just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a bit better hardware performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The LG G Pro 2 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, although it has a quite smaller screen, a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a quite lower pixels density. The Galaxy S10 Lite has much more memory to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a very superior battery duration than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41% greater battery size. Galaxy S10 Lite takes greater videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has better video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs a bit more money than the LG G Pro 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.