Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is better than LG G Pro 2, getting an 86.3 score against 74.8. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a a lot newer device, and it is also just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG G Pro 2. Galaxy S10e has a bit better processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
The LG G Pro 2 has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per display inch and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy S10e has a bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better photos in poorly lited environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy S10e features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG G Pro 2 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than the LG G Pro 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.