Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 is much better than the LG G Pro 2, with a 94.8 score against 74.8. Galaxy S20 is a much newer device, and it's also a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the LG G Pro 2. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives some extra features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cores and more RAM. Galaxy S20 counts with a little sharper display than LG G Pro 2, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little bigger display and a much higher screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much greater storage for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S20 features better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S20 takes better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality photographs and a way bigger aperture.
The Galaxy S20 is way more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.