Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is much better than the LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 90.8 against 74.8. Galaxy S20 FE is a a bit heavier phone than LG G Pro 2, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it offers some nice extra features and better performance.
The LG G Pro 2 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, a bit smaller screen and a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little better processing power than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster). Galaxy S20 FE features a superior battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE captures better photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a lower video definition and a back facing camera with less MP, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a lot more expensive than LG G Pro 2, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.