Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-02-12 | -- |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.07 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is much better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a general score of 82.6 against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a lighter and notably thinner phone than the LG G Pro 2. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a more recent 14 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Pro 2 counts with a much better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has lesser cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking screen than LG G Pro 2, because it has a little greater pixel count in each inch of screen, a quite larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than LG G Pro 2, because it has a camera with much more mega-pixels, a way better video quality, a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments and a lot larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S25 features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 features improved battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Pro 2. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG G Pro 2, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.