Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is much better than LG G Pro 2, having a score of 83.3 against 74.8. Galaxy S9 is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than LG G Pro 2, but both have the same thickness. The Galaxy S9 has a little better hardware performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 1 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little bit better display than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 captures slightly better photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a less megapixels back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a way larger camera aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
The LG G Pro 2 features just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S9 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.