Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 373 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the LG G Pro 2, getting an 80.1 score against 74.8. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is much newer than the LG G Pro 2's, but it is heavier and much thicker. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a much greater screen pixel density. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The LG G Pro 2 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and photographs and a lot smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos, it also counts with a back camera with a better 13 MP resolution and a lot better (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much greater memory for apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Pro 2. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG G Pro 2, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.