Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than LG G Pro 2, with a overall score of 88.5 against 74.8. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, providing you a lot of extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a bit heavier than LG G Pro 2.
The LG G Pro 2 counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower screen density, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display. Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better camera than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a much bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Pro 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG G Pro 2, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.