Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a score of 92.3, which is a lot better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 score. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives a couple additional features and increased performance. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly newer and somewhat thinner phone than the LG G Pro 2, although it is also just a little heavier.
The LG G Pro 2 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better processing power than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a bit better battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with lesser mega pixels, it also counts with a much larger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way more expensive than the LG G Pro 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.