Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is way better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the LG G Pro 2's, although it is also heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a really smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has a camera with lesser megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor and a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G Pro 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G Pro 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG G Pro 2, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.