Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is a lot better than LG G Pro 2's 74.8 score. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a much newer and a lot thinner phone than the LG G Pro 2, but it is also a lot heavier. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it gives you some nice extra features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better hardware performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory. The LG G Pro 2 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the display.
LG G Pro 2 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a better resolution back-facing camera. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.