Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 11 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL 20 Pro 5G is a bit better than the LG G Pro 2, with a global score of 76.1 against 74.8. Although the TCL 20 Pro 5G is noticeably newer than the LG G Pro 2, it's just a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the TCL 20 Pro 5G has the newer 11 version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, giving you some additional features and some performance improvements.
LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit better processor than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 3 GB less RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. The LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a bit smaller display and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. The TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
TCL 20 Pro 5G shoots way better videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a lot higher resolution camera, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a lot larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.