Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than LG G Pro 2, having a global score of 86.6 against 74.8. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is extremely newer than LG G Pro 2, it's noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0, so it offers some nice extra features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with just a little better performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. LG G Pro 2 has just a bit better display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, although it has a little bit smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a just a little worse display pixels density.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots greater videos and photos than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a way bigger diafragm aperture, better video frame rate, a much larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with much more storage to install applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much better battery lifetime than LG G Pro 2, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.