Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is way better than LG G Pro 2, having a 90.1 score against 74.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's construction is extremely newer, but way heavier and somewhat thicker than LG G Pro 2.
LG G Pro 2 features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, a little bit lower pixels density and a little smaller display. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little better processing power than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG G Pro 2, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a lot better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a lot larger sensor, a way bigger diafragm aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much longer battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 56% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.