Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a bit better than the LG G Pro 2, getting a 78.2 score against 74.8. Xiaomi Poco M3's design is a lot newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than LG G Pro 2. These phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco M3 has a newer 10 version while LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0 version, so it counts with some additional features.
LG G Pro 2 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The LG G Pro 2 has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M3, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a superior camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a back facing camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations and a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G Pro 2, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way better battery life than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Poco M3 is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.