Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| Android 5.0, 4.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.22 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Gray, Red and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2260 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 29.22mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has an overall score of 76.6, which is slightly better than the LG G Pro 2's 74.8 global score. ZTE Axon 10s Pro's design is notably newer and just a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the LG G Pro 2. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but ZTE Axon 10s Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version and LG G Pro 2 has Android 5.0.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a bit better hardware performance than LG G Pro 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM. The LG G Pro 2 has a slightly better screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it has a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a just a little inferior pixels amount in each inch of display and a little smaller display.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a little bit better camera than LG G Pro 2, and although they both have the same (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot better resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and pictures.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than LG G Pro 2, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. ZTE Axon 10s Pro has longer battery performance than LG G Pro 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.