Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-05-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than LG G3, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 74.1. The LG Velvet body is newer and thinner than LG G3's, although it is also somewhat heavier. LG G3 has a way better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with much more memory for games and applications than LG G3, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG G3 and LG Velvet feature incredibly similar processors, because although the LG Velvet has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM.
The LG Velvet shoots greater pictures and videos than LG G3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the LG Velvet also has a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a way bigger back camera sensor and a camera with a much higher resolution.
LG Velvet features a way better battery duration than LG G3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG Velvet costs a little more than the LG G3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.