Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-05-27 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White | Titan gray |
| $ 155.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than LG G3, with a global score of 85.4 against 76.4. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has a more recent 10 version while LG G3 has Android 5.0. Although the LG K92 is a lot heavier than the LG G3, it's just a little thinner and also much newer.
The LG G3 counts with a way better looking screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. LG G3 has a bit more powerful processor than LG K92, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM and 4 lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The LG K92 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 counts with a very superior camera than LG G3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a lot larger aperture to take better low light images, a camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution and a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
LG K92 features better battery life than LG G3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G3. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G3, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.