Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-05-27 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White | Mirror black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 155.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Q70 has a global score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than LG G3's 76.4 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the LG Q70 has a newer 10 version while LG G3 has Android 5.0. LG Q70's construction is a lot newer and just a little thinner, but also way heavier than the LG G3.
LG G3 features a much better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels number per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. LG Q70 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than LG G3, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage.
LG G3 has a little faster processing unit than LG Q70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The LG Q70 has better battery duration than LG G3, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size. The LG Q70 has a superior camera than LG G3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also has a much higher 32 mega pixels resolution back camera, a bigger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a way larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Although LG Q70 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG Q70, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G3, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.