Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-05-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than LG G3, getting an 87.1 score against 76.4. The LG Velvet is a way newer and thinner cellphone than the LG G3, but it is also heavier. The LG G3 has a bit more powerful CPU than LG Velvet, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra GPU.
The LG G3 counts with a lot better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The LG Velvet takes a lot better photos and videos than LG G3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a lot bigger sensor, a back facing camera with much more MP and a much bigger aperture.
LG Velvet features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G3, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG Velvet features a much better battery life than LG G3, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The LG Velvet is way more expensive than LG G3, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.