Compare phones
LG G3
AT&TD850
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-05-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Purple and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 155.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 10 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 548 hours standby time 19 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the LG G3, getting a score of 97.6 against 76.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG G3 has Android 5.0. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is noticeably newer and much thinner, but also way heavier than the LG G3.
LG G3 counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than LG G3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better camera than LG G3, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photos and a much bigger diafragm aperture. The Galaxy Fold has much more storage to install games and applications than LG G3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a very superior battery life than LG G3, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G3. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and buy the LG G3, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.