Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, with a global score of 88.1 against 72.6. Apple iPhone X's body is much newer and thinner than LG G3 Cat. 6's, although it's somewhat heavier. The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a slightly better display than iPhone X, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little better pixels amount per inch in the screen.
The iPhone X counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. IPhone X counts with a little better performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone X also counts with more CPU cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone X captures way better videos and photos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a worse resolution back camera. LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a little better battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G3 Cat. 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G3 Cat. 6. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG G3 Cat. 6, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.