Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-07-22 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ is much better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, with a score of 81 against 72.6. LG G7 ThinQ's design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little heavier than LG G3 Cat. 6. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G7 ThinQ has the newer 9.0 Pie version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version.
LG G3 Cat. 6 and LG G7 ThinQ have very similar processing units, because although the LG G7 ThinQ has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores. LG G7 ThinQ features just a bit better looking screen than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a just a little greater display pixel density, a quite bigger display and a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG G7 ThinQ takes way better videos and photos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a camera in the back with a better resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ has much more storage to store more games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ and LG G3 Cat. 6 both feature very similar battery performance.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.