Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-04-11 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is much better than LG G3 Cat. 6, having a global score of 84.3 against 72.6. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG G8 ThinQ has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version. Even though the LG G8 ThinQ is a bit heavier than the LG G3 Cat. 6, it's a little bit thinner and newer.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a bit better performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and 4 more cores. The LG G3 Cat. 6 features just a bit better display than LG G8 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower display pixels density, a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution.
LG G8 ThinQ takes much clearer photographs and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera. The LG G8 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G8 ThinQ features a bit superior battery lifetime than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The LG G8 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the LG G3 Cat. 6, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.