Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than LG G3 Cat. 6's 72.6 score. LG V35 ThinQ's body is a lot newer and thinner than LG G3 Cat. 6's, although it's just a bit heavier. LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a little bit better looking display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a little lower quantity of pixels per display inch and a little bit smaller display.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way bigger memory for apps and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 3 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a higher resolution back-facing camera. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit superior battery performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.