Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a global score of 81.2 against 72.6. Even though the LG V40 ThinQ is a little heavier than LG G3 Cat. 6, it's somewhat thinner and also newer. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a slightly better looking display than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch of display, a little bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little smaller screen. The LG V40 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V40 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and more RAM memory. LG V40 ThinQ has a little longer battery duration than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 3300mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ takes greater pictures and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V40 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.