Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a general score of 87.1 against 72.6. LG Velvet is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than the LG G3 Cat. 6, although it is also heavier. The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a bit faster processor than LG Velvet, because although it has 4 less CPU cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per display inch and a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. The LG Velvet captures much better photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The LG Velvet has a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG Velvet features a much longer battery duration than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
The LG Velvet costs a little more money than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.