Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a overall score of 83.8 against 72.6. Although the Galaxy A50 is just a little bit heavier than LG G3 Cat. 6, it's thinner and notably newer. The LG G3 Cat. 6 has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. LG G3 Cat. 6 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy A50 counts with longer battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures greater photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a much higher 25 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.