Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, with a score of 86.6 against 72.6. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the previous 10 version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than the LG G3 Cat. 6, although it's a little bit heavier.
LG G3 Cat. 6 has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixel density. The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50s, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50s shoots a lot better videos and photos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Galaxy A50s counts with longer battery lifetime than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.