Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than LG G3 Cat. 6, with a score of 85.5 against 72.6. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version. Although Galaxy A51 is somewhat heavier than the LG G3 Cat. 6, it's somewhat thinner and noticeably newer.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 has a better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A51 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG G3 Cat. 6 features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A51, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although they are faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy A51 features a greater camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy A51 counts with longer battery lifetime than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Galaxy A51 costs a bit more than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.