Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than LG G3 Cat. 6's global score of 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than LG G3 Cat. 6's, although it is heavier. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. LG G3 Cat. 6 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch in the screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution. Galaxy A51 5G has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a really longer battery performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is more expensive than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.