Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a global score of 91.3 against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G construction is notably newer and just a little thinner, but heavier than the LG G3 Cat. 6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an older 12 version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel quantity per screen inch. The Galaxy A52 5G features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG G3 Cat. 6 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has less RAM and 4 less cores (although faster), it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots way better photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a camera with a much better 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.