Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is way better than the LG G3 Cat. 6's 72.6 general score. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is somewhat heavier than LG G3 Cat. 6, it's a little bit thinner and extremely newer. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version while LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 features a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has less CPU cores (although faster) and 5 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. LG G3 Cat. 6 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels number per inch of screen.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better pictures and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a lot more expensive than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.