Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is way better than the LG G3 Cat. 6's 72.6 score. The Galaxy Note 20 is a way newer and a little thinner cellphone than the LG G3 Cat. 6, although it is also extremely heavier. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a little faster CPU than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
LG G3 Cat. 6 has a brighter display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes way better videos and photos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy Note 20 has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 has a really longer battery performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 43% larger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G3 Cat. 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G3 Cat. 6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG G3 Cat. 6, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.