Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-07-22 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than LG G3 Cat. 6, getting a 98.9 score against 72.6. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a lot newer and somewhat thinner phone than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but it's incredibly heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and LG G3 Cat. 6 has Android 4.4.2.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little better hardware performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory for games and applications than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior battery performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way more expensive than LG G3 Cat. 6, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.