Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is a lot better than LG G3 Cat. 6's 72.6 general score. Even though Galaxy Note10 is just a little heavier than the LG G3 Cat. 6, it's thinner and notably newer. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better hardware performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel density. The Galaxy Note10 shoots a lot better pictures and videos than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a back-facing camera with lesser MP resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit better battery life than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G3 Cat. 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G3 Cat. 6. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G3 Cat. 6, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.