Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-07-22 | 2019-03-08 |
| 5.76 x 2.94 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.43 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is much better than LG G3 Cat. 6, having an 86.3 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S10e's construction is extremely newer, a little lighter and thinner than the LG G3 Cat. 6. Galaxy S10e has a little bit better processing power than LG G3 Cat. 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The LG G3 Cat. 6 has a better display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Galaxy S10e has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S10e has a lot better camera than LG G3 Cat. 6, although it has a camera with a worse 12 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy S10e counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG G3 Cat. 6, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10e costs a lot more money than the LG G3 Cat. 6, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.